Representatives of registered nurses testified against bills introduced by Rep. Birmingham and Rep. Lewis R. Sullivan to restrict applications for registration as nurses to U.S. citizens, during a Feb. 4 hearing of the Legislative Committee on Public Health (Boston Globe, Feb. 5, 1932, p. 15).
Rep. Sullivan spoke in favor of his bill and then introduced James F. Burns, who said that many hospitals were bringing in cheap labor from other countries under contract. These women “will be allowed to go before the public as nurses after their training period,” he said. Testifying against the bills were Josephine E. Thurlow, chairman of the Massachusetts Board of Registration of Nurses, Elizabeth Ross, president of the State Nurses’ Association, and Stella Goostray, member of the Board of Registration of Nurses and superintendent of Children’s Hospital.
0 Comments
Gov. Ely held a conference Sept. 8 with House Speaker Saltonstall and later with Rep. Birmingham about a proposed special session of the legislature, the Boston Globe reported (Sept. 8, 1932, p. 23).
The special session was intended to pass legislation to provide funds to cities and towns for welcome work and other administrative matters. The governor said that the sessions with Saltonstall and Birmingham were to discuss the special session but he hadn’t yet decided whether to hold one. House Speaker Leverett Saltonstall had to rap his gavel twice on Rep. Birmingham over remarks the Democratic House leader made about Lieutenant Governor William Youngman during House floor debate April 28 (Boston Globe, April 29, pp. 1, 24). In a message to the legislature, Youngman had recommended revoking the state purchase of the inoperative Boston, Worcester, and New York Street Railway franchise for $563,000 to build the Boston-Worcester turnpike along the tracks. Youngman asked the legislature to take steps to recover the $200,000 already paid and stop payment of the remaining $363,000. Birmingham charged that the “case has been tried in the newspapers by the Lieutenant Governor.” In response, Saltonstall rapped Birmingham to order, noting that the motive behind the message was prohibited from being debated. Birmingham again referred to Youngman and again Saltonstall banged his gavel and asked the Democratic minority leader to abide by the ruling of the chair. Birmingham said he would abide by the chair’s ruling because he would have an opportunity later to discuss the message. Birmingham urged the approval of Rep. Jewett’s motion to print Youngman’s message and postpone action on the message. Jewett said his motion was customary when the House received a message from the governor. By a voice vote, the House postponed consideration until the following Tuesday. At the time Youngman submitted the message, he was acting governor since Gov. Ely was out of state at the national Governors’ Conference at the time. Ely reacted angrily, charging Youngman with a breach of faith. The House Rules Committee reviewed on March 12 a bill introduced by Rep. Birmingham to expand the state detective force by 10 personnel.
Birmingham said that the additional personnel must come from the Civil Service lists and not from other branches of the Department of Public Safety. He argued that the efficiency of the detective bureau would be improved by this process. Rep. Frank J. McFarland of Dorchester supported Birmingham’s bill and opposed transferring personnel from the uniformed State Police force to the detective branch. Rep. Birmingham was hospitalized for an undisclosed ailment at the Cardinal O’Connell House in St. Elizabeth’s Hospital, the Boston Globe reported Oct. 29, 1934, p. 3.
Birmingham had been sick for several weeks. He was admitted to the hospital Oct. 27 and was expected to be hospitalized for at least two weeks. The paper said that Birmingham had been a member of the House from Ward 22 for 10 years and the House Democratic floor leader for the past four years. He was a funeral director with an office on Market St., Brighton. The following January, the caucus of the House Democratic members sent a message of cheer to Birmingham, who was at home sick (Boston Globe, Jan. 2, 1935, p. 34). As a result of his illness, he did not run for House Democratic floor leader in 1935 (Boston Globe, Jan. 2, 1935, p. 4). Birmingham subsequently died of lung cancer in January 1936. Sharles E. Wardwell, counsel for the Massachusetts Gas and Electric Association, told the Legislative Committee on Power and Light April 23 that Rep. Birmingham’s minority report on power rates drew an inaccurate picture of comparative costs of operating municipal and private power plants (Boston Globe, April 23, 1930, p. 11).
Wardwell said that if the Boston Edison Company did business on the same basis as the Belmont municipal power plant, which charges a rate of five cents per kilowatt hour, the rate the Boston company would charge would be around 3½ cents instead of the 8 ½ cent maximum rate that is now imposed. Birmingham produced the minority report of a special commission set up by the House to look into the power rate situation. Wardwell said it was virtually impossible to compare the rates in one community with a private plant with the rates in another community with a municipal plant. Not only are the conductions in the two communities differences, but methods of doing business, such as taxation, lamp service, and average costs, differ materially, he argued. Wardwell also denied challenged Birmingham’s assertion that not only the costs devolving on communities for legal expenses in fighting lighting company rate increases are borne by them, but as well the costs of the companies in this respect. Such an assertion may be true in the event that the company is making a profit, but it is not true if it is not making a profit. In the latter case, the cost is borne by the stockholders, he said. Rep. Birmingham spoke in favor of a bill to extend the Boylston St. subway under Governor Square (now Kenmore Square) to a place on Beacon St. east of the railroad bridge and to a place on Commonwealth Ave. opposite Temple Israel (Boston Globe, March 20, 1930, pp. 1, 25). The House Committee on Metropolitan Affairs held a March 19 hearing on the bill. The bill was opposed by several municipalities, whose representatives testified that the subway extension would establish a dangerous precedent by requiring outlying cities and towns to contribute to maintenance of a measure intended to solve traffic problems in Boston, not to improve the regional transit system. The bill, they argued, would also compel the municipalities to be responsible for any deficits in the operations of the subway, the paper reported. In support of the bill, Birmingham said that the proposed subway extension was necessary. Corporation Council Samuel Silverman, representing Mayor Curley, testified in favor of the bill, noting that it came out of conference committee composed of Silverman, Boston Elevated representative Frederick E. Snow, and counsel for the public trustees of the road, H. Ware Barnum. Silverman said that the extension would cost $3 million and would be paid for by bonds of the city of Boston, which would contract with the company for annual rental of not less than 4½ percent. Any deficit would be met by the cities and towns in the Metropolitan Transit District; the cities and town would not be reimbursed, he admitted. Rep. Luke D. Mullen of Boston asked Silverman why the bill had not been referred to the Metropolitan Council, which had been established to rule on extensions of the transit system. Silverman said that the committee was concerned that referring the bill to the council would only cause delay. |
Archives
October 2019
Categories
All
|